Jump to content

Ryan-Smith

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    0 [ Donate ]

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ryan-Smith

  • Rank
    Newbie
  • Birthday 01/01/1990

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://mlsdev.com/blog/53-how-much-does-it-cost-to-develop-a-mobile-app

Profile Information

  • Location
    Las Vegas
  • Country:
    United States

Profile Fields

  • Interests
    Android App Development

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Nowadays the major tasks software development companies are facing are timely development and delivery of software. Agile SDLC provides a flexible approach to software development in a fast-paced environment with ever-changing customer needs. The most important advantage of Agile software development life cycle implementation is plain to see. The Agile approach covers the continuous changes that dominate in software development processes. That is why teams can deliver working software fast and release updates more often. So, not to adopt Agile SDLC seems not reasonable. Overview of Traditional and Agile SDLC Models Quick changes in the modern technical world make developers keep up while they are still delivering top-notch software on time. To streamline the development process companies use different approaches. Here different software development life cycle models are used. Traditional SDLC vs Agile SDLC: Comparing the Models All software development methodologies can be adaptive or predictive. The adaptive subcategory includes Agile SDLC, while Waterfall, V-shaped, Iterative and Spiral models all belong to the predictive approach. They are designed to meet a number of development requirements and expectations that differ from company to company. Here you will read about the predictive software development models: V-shaped SDLC Model is based on the Waterfall model. The development process is associated with flowing water. The development team moves step by step through different SDLC stages. Every stage finishes with testing and a team moves on to the next only after the previous stage is complete. This model is also named Validation-Verification. If all requirements have been fulfilled and the team can move on to another software development phase. Don't forget that you cannot easily move back a step to fix or add something if you use the V-shaped SDLC model. This model won’t work for you if your software product is new, has many features to be implemented, or you are not sure about the final functionality. The Iterative approach can be used in projects without the full list of requirements, you only need the requirements for the functional part. Later in the development process, these requirements can be expanded. The approach goes through all SDLC steps, from analysis, to design, to coding, to testing, and back to analysis. The process is repetitive and lets create a new product version for every cycle. Each iteration lasts from two to six weeks. The result in mind is the release of a new component, which is then added to the existing components and features. The software development team moves the project to the final version of the planned software step by step. The need for repetitive iterations is considered to be the main flaw of this model. If it is not used wisely it may quickly drain the resources for unnecessary changes. This approach will not be good for startups with limited financial means. In Spiral SDLC Model a great emphasis is placed on risk analysis. The whole development process is split up into many small phases to follow. It may lead to the loss of time and money if the product is new and the final product does not need to be excessively documented. This model can be very expensive for small and low-risk projects. Here https://mlsdev.com/blog/agile-sdlc you can get full information about the Agile SDLC model, its correlation with traditional SDLC models, and how to make use of the best Agile practices.
  2. The need for IoT healthcare has increased because of an aging population, expensive medical services, and outdated healthcare infrastructure. Affordable and innovative health care is a future reality. The IoT allows us to change this industry fundamentally. The IoT and healthcare have created incredible solutions for many pressing problems. They reduce health costs and waiting time, and make healthcare and medical checks accessible to everyone from home. Now let’s discuss the benefits of IoT healthcare. - Real-time health monitoring Real-time monitoring with smart health devices can save lives in the event of a medical emergency. An IoT healthcare system receives information about heart failure, asthma attack, or another malfunction. It then transfers the collected data to an emergency station. - Professional assistance around the world Smart medical devices collect and transfer important health data, including but not limited to blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen and blood sugar levels, ECGs, etc. Data stored in the cloud can be shared with doctors from any part of the world. They can look at the data from a device with the installed app to provide a specialized medical consultation and help patients regardless of their location. As a result, we get better medical services no matter where and when. - Reduced emergency room wait times By implementing the AutoBed software, Mt. Sinai Medical Center in New York City was able to slash wait time for 50% for patients in need of inpatient care. The software with smart beds tracks the bed occupancy in the hospital and provides insight into how to place patients more efficiently and use the available patient capacity to the utmost. Follow this article https://mlsdev.com/blog/iot-healthcare to find out more about the benefits of applying IoT in healthcare.
  3. Ruby on Rails has a few beneficial arguments that developers can't ignore. As soon as all of them are combined, they decrease the development time and make the process more efficient. This back-end framework has a number of advantages for projects: Extensive ecosystem In comparison with many other frameworks, its ecosystem is what makes Ruby on Rails superior. RubyGems, a Ruby community’s gem hosting service, provides access to thousands of many gems, which can take the form of add-ons, libraries, or software snippets. Gems are ready-made solutions for different problems that streamline the development process. Ruby on Rails MVC Another integral part of the Ruby on Rails framework is MVC. It means Model-View-Controller format. The approach divides the app work into three subsystems, each of which is responsible for a set of actions: Models handle data and business logic Controllers handle the user interface and application Views handle graphical user interface objects and presentation Ruby on Rails MVC lets parallel development and allows programmers to speed up the engineering process three times. Ruby on Rails gives ready-to-use baskets for separation of the app business logic, in such a way a Ruby on Rails web development company can save time through its utilization. Consistency and clean code The implementation of many features can be simplified by the fact that Ruby on Rails developers can utilize the ready-to-use parts of code. In such a way, the application code is clean and has high readability. As you have less code to read and sort through, all future updates are fast and seamless. This makes Ruby on Rails development time and cost efficient. DRY DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) is one more of the principals Ruby on Rails is built on. If you have a repetitive task, in Ruby on Rails development, you can reuse them an unlimited number of times. High scalability One more advantage is its scalability. An app built on RoR can be scaled to process thousands of requests per second sent by multiple users. This means that Ruby on Rails is a great solution for apps that are actively growing their audience. Security Its security is one more benefit. Ruby on Rails has some security-centric features built in that make applications safe from SQL-injections and XSS attacks. Besides, there are a lot of gems that address other security threats. Time and cost efficiency All of the features already mentioned make Ruby on Rails time and cost efficient. RAD Rapid application development (RAD) is one more sphere Ruby on Rails is used for, which streamlines the process of change accommodation. Self-documentation As mentioned above, Ruby code is highly readable and self-documenting (self-describing). It makes the development process quicker because the development team doesn’t have to write out separate documentation. New members in development teams should not have problems with understanding the concept and participating in existing projects. Test environment This back-end framework has three default environments: production, development, and testing. The whole development cycle is optimized and you can test a product that is being developed at every stage. As a result, there are fewer bugs and errors that you should be aware of and debug. This is important to consider when you determine what is Ruby on Rails is used for. Convention over configuration One of the key principles of Ruby on Rails development is convention over configuration. With its help, the time spend on configuring files is reduced. There is a set of rules in Ruby on Rails framework which makes it easier for aspiring Ruby on Rails developers to start using the framework. The code becomes readable and concise while using conventions, besides, it allows for easy navigation inside a Ruby on Rails web application. Downsides of Ruby on Rails Development Although Ruby on Rails has a lot of advantages, it also has some disadvantages which you need to consider before deciding what Ruby on Rails is used for and whether it is a fit or not: Documentation Sometimes it is really difficult to find documentation with Ruby on Rails framework. This happens because not many developers tend to document everything as the problem is especially ever-present in the use of gems. Runtime speed Runtime speed is usually called the major argument against Ruby on Rails. If you compare the runtime speeds of Ruby on Rails vs Node.JS vs GoLang, Ruby on Rails lags behind. On the other hand, when we take the Java framework Spring, RoR wins this battle. More details can be found here.
×
×
  • Create New...